This index is an ongoing study, updated and refined quarterly. Many of the cities studied are now approaching their data collection limits, which brings us to the next phase of development: identifying and collecting data that measures bio-capacity and human anthropogenic footprints in greater depth. This is an iterative process that requires collaboration with all levels of government, academia and industry. The goal is to create tools that give people greater visibility into the human impact on the biosphere and identify areas where solutions can have a substantial impact.
Below are the Bio Capacity I Edition score results
113 Québec City
128 Richmond Hill
110 Greater Sudbury
136 St. Johns
116 Saint John
106 St. Catharines
92 Thunder Bay
One indicator was revised and two were added. The system went through a data processing audit which delayed the score release by a day.
- Workforce Commuting Outside City formula was adjusted
- Organic Waste Tonnage new indicator
- Wilderness Reserve Area new indicator
- Max/Min calculation code used to determin maximums and minimums were adjusted
- Ceilings are awarded to indicators who's calculations use data points are ceilings themselves
In this edition the updates listed above were implimented. Where possible, links to the data are included in the downloadable spreadsheets. All data updates since the last index run were included.
- Normalized Values are comparative values between zero and one which make them ideal for indicators. Cities are split into "City Size Categories" then maximum and minimum's are calculated from city data points within those categories. This is what makes city comparison scores meaningful.
- Floor Scores are the minimum city value for each indicator within it's City Size Categories. When data points for an indicator are missing it's score is assigned zero, however, if that indicator is needed in the calculation of another indicator then the minimum value is used.
- Ceiling Scores are used when a city data point is extremely large and if used, it would dwarf all other city scores; the next highest score is then used to calculate the maximum, then. the ceilinged city is awarded the maximum score within its City Size Category. Ceilings are caused by unusual circumstances that go beyond the current scoring methods and warrant further study.
- Missing data points are replaced with provincial defaults where possible but If no provincial statistic exists, then the data point is zeroed.
- Indicator weighting is now used for temperature extremes. In future editions weighting will be applied to other indicators so as to reflect their anthropogenic impact more accurately.
- Stale dated data weighting is not used yet. This function will be introduced once there is sufficient historical data to do our impact analysis.
Our research shows that smaller cities have smaller eco-footprints which is an inescapable fact due to scale! Larger cities have mass transit infrastructure which is not viable in smaller cities, so classifying cities by size makes comparative analysis possible and fair to all cities studied.
Smaller populations have smaller footprints. They require less space for residential, commercial, industrial, recreation and other uses; all of which make footprints smaller.
Measured in square km. Larger municipal boundaries create larger city footprints. Annexation and amalgamation are how cities grow in size and this is always done for economic reasons. The exceptions to this rule are Halifax and Saguenay; both of these cities have extensive wilderness reserves inside their boundaries which skews both Municipal Area and Population Density indicators. For this reason they are given ceiling scores for both indicators.
Population Density: calculated from multiple data points
Protected greenspace areas are subtracted from Municipal Area because it reflects a more realistic density calculation. Higher population densities mean less space is used for more human activity. It is a measurement of footprint efficiency thus making higher density scores more desirable. It is also an indirect measurement of urban sprawl which has become the largest cause of greenspace loss inside city limits. Wilderness Reserve Area's are now included in this calculation. Higher is better.
Population Growth Pressure:
The percentage of population growth. Slower population growth requires less space to grow into which means smaller footprint growth. Any cities with a negative growth is assigned zero growth because negative growth is currently beyond the scope of this study.
Travel To Work By:
Measures a population's uptake of public transit, cycling and walking commuting habits. It is a percentile measurement where higher scores are better. In this edition no transportation footprint weighting factors were used.
- Personal Automobile weighting factor is ZERO (excluded currently)
- Public Transit weighting factor is 1 (Buses, Trains, Infrastructure Footprints)
- Cycling weighting factor is 1 (Bike Paths, Parking, Infrastructure Footprints)
- Walking weighting factor is 1 (No infrastructure required)
Driving Distance For Solo Commutes:
This indicator scores the median driving distance in kilometers for solo automobile commuters travelling.
Lower is better.
Workforce Commuting Outside City: Revised - calculated using Population Impact
Measures the percentage of the workforce traveling outside the city for employment. This causes heavy traffic and poor air quality. Lower is better.
Culture Activity: Under Review
Measures proximity to Libraries, Museums, etc.. It approximates community activity and cohesiveness.
Smaller is better.
Economic Activity: Under Review
Measures GDP and GDP Growth. Currently higher is better but this indicator is very subjective and will likely be removed in a future edition. Higher is better.
This indicator scores residential housing footprints. Until cities start publishing their real housing statistics we are stuck using a Municipal Census data proxy. The footprint of a high rise apartment building is much lower per person than a single detached house. We use a weighting factor to approximate the footprints.
- Single Detached Percentile with footprint weighting factor 10
- Apartments 5 Story+ Percentile with footprint weighting factor 1
- All Other Structures Percentile with footprint weighting factor 4
Air Pollution Emissions:
It is a measure of Total Particulate Matter (TPM) The substances measured are: Particulate Matter 10 Microns or less, Particulate Matter 2.5 Microns or less, Sulfur Oxides, Nitrogen Oxides, Volatile Organic Compounds and Carbon Monoxide. Lower is better.
Solid Waste Tonnage:
Total tonnage of garbage before recycling redirect percentage. Lower is better
Recycling Diversion Rate:
Percentage of waste recycled and redirected away from landfills. Higher is better
Organic Waste Tonnage: New
Total organic matter tonnage collected by city from all sources. Higher is better
Domestic Water Usage: Lower is better.
Provinces track Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and publish data for the whole province. Cities are now expected to report GHG emissions to provincial and/or federal government agencies and we will use that data as it becomes available. Lower is better.
Renewable Electrical Capacity:
This is a percentage calculation. Some cities measure their own capacity but most rely on Provincial statistics. Higher is better.
Green Initiatives On Website:
We do not score content and only the existence of an ecological initiatives landing page with links to recycling, green space initiatives, protection programs, etc.. We maintain links to it for all cities in the index. A clear landing page scores higher.
Temperature Extremes Summer And Winter:
These two indicators look at monthly temperature averages which are now the best way to reflect the abrupt climate change we have been experiencing. Hot and cold weather extremes place peak demands on the utilities for heating and cooling. In warmer temperate zones vegetation is active longer and can sequester more C02 and other emissions, but during winter the vegetation is dormant sequestration drops off. This is normal for Canada, so the winter indicator is weighted at 40% and summer is weighted at 60%. Milder is better.
Parkland connects us to nature and helps build ecological empathy. Parks are also habitat for nature, so the more park space a city the more eco-friendly it is. Higher area is better.
More parks mean greater residential accessibility. The closer the proximity to parks, the more likely we are to walk in them and experience nature. Also, they can become wildlife corridors for insects, birds, etc..
Higher is better.
Wilderness Area: New
This is what nature is all about! Ecological empathy is cultivated when we regularly visit nature reserves and experience the wildlife and fauna. Higher is better.
Biological Temperate Zone:
It uses the Plant Hardiness Index of each city. The higher the number the more biologically friendly the year round climate is. Higher is better.
Data Completeness: calculated from all city data points
The total number of indicators data points collected including unreleased indicator data points. When cities measure and track things, they become visible and gain value which can be included in planning decisions.
Higher is better.
It is the sum of all indicators times 10 then rounded to the nearest whole number. This removes the need for a decimal places which makes the score more readable for public audiences.
City Size Categories
Population Growth Pressure
Travel to Work by
Driving Distance For Solo Commutes
(Revised) Workforce Commuting Outside City
(Under Review) Culture Activity
(Under Review) Economic Activity
Air Pollution Emissions
(New) Organic Waste Tonnage
Domestic Water Usage
Renewable Electrical Capacity
Green Initiatives On Website
Temperature Extremes Winter
Temperature Extremes Summer
(New) Wilderness Areas
Biological Temperate Zone
Determines grouping for normalization max / min calculations
Score = 1 - Normalized Population
Score = 1 - Normalized Area
Score = Normalized(Pop. / (Municipal Area - Greenspace Area))
Score = Normalized percentage growth, if < 0 use 0
Score = Sum of Normalized(Percentages x Weighting Factor)
Score = 1 - Normalized Median Driving Distance
Score = 1 - Normalized(Population x Percentage)
Score = Sum of Normalized( counts of (Library,Museum, etc..) )
Score = Sum of Normalized(GDP,GDP Growth, etc..)
Score = 1 - Normalized sum of (Structure Percentile x Weighting)
Score = 1 - Normalized(sum of Air Pollutants)
Score = 1 - Normalized Garbage Tonnage
Score = Normalized Percentage of Garbage Recycled
Score = Normalized Curbside Composte Tonnage
Score = 1 - Normalized Water Usage
Score = 1 - Normalized City GHG
Score = Renewable Capacity / Total Capacity
Score = 1 for a clear landing page, Otherwise score = 0
Score = | Normalized (Winter Min Monthly Avg) | x 40%
Score = 1 - | Normalized (Summer Max Monthly Avg) | x 60%
Score = Normalized Sum of Parkland Area
Score = Normalized Park Count
Score = Normalized Sum of Wilderness Area
Score = (Plant Hardiness Index) / 100
Score = (Indicator Count - Missing Data Points) / 10
Score = (Sum of Indicator Scores) x 10